On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 03:05 +0200, Michael Matz wrote: > I don't think we should necessarily limit ourself by bugs in foreign tools > if it reduces useful information. What about a new top-level directory > dead-branches/, not under branches/ but parallel to it? Should be easy to > exempt from git-svn handling, shouldn't it?
I found that svn log works well if you do this: svn log svn+ssh://b...@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc | less The important thing is to make sure that the log message carefully describes the name of the branch when it is deleted, so that one can search the log output to find it. I deleted a personal branch from 5 years ago and have added the revision number of the delete commit to the branch description in svn.html. Would these two conventions suffice? Ben
