Kai Tietz wrote: Oh, I forgot to address:
> I just suggested this patch, to have at least an implementation here
> for win32 for further improvement
This is the java security package. Having a vulnerable implementation is
worse IMO than having none at all; I think it would be better to just throw an
exception than use rand(), so if you want a patch to just get the build
working, that would be a fairly simple solution.
cheers,
DaveK
