Sorry about the delay in the answer (4th of July weekend...).
Anyway, I agree it might not be necessary. I put it there because of
the force_reg call. Since that call might in turn call gen_reg_rtx, it
will then start off with an assertion of can_create_pseudo_p.
That is why, I thought best to put that test.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Richard Henderson<r...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/01/2009 02:02 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
>>
>> ((reload_in_progress | reload_completed) == 0&&
>> MEM_P (op0)&& !REG_P (op1)))
>> {
>> op1 = force_reg (GET_MODE (op0), op1);
>> emit_move_insn (op0, op1);
>> return 1;
>
> I wouldn't think you'd actually need these reload checks.
> At least some other ports I glanced at don't need them.
>
>
> r~
>
