> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, > FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 > From: Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> > Cc: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cyg...@googlemail.com>, i...@google.com, > gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:30:35 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes: > > > Granted, I know very well why it doesn't work with cpp and gcc. But I > > was talking about _user_documentation_, and from the user's point of > > view (as opposed to GCC programmer/hacker POV), the distinction is not > > quite obvious. Either the docs should be fixed to make that clear, or > > (better) the code should be modified to support all related programs. > > Perhaps the description of the options should be moved to the internals > documentation (since they are somewhat gcc-internal options), and the > user documentation should just refer to it ("for the curious").
That'd be fine with me, but even internals should be documented better, IMO.