On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:34:01PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 06:49:58AM -0700, Bingfeng Mei wrote: > > Thanks, I didn't notice both functions have different arguments after > > transformation. > > However, gprof produces T.251 in its statistics, completely unknown > > to user. Could GCC use more informative name here, e.g., > > saveInputFileMetaInfo.251? > > The current trunk (what is to become gcc 4.5) already gives clones a > more sensible name, in your example it would be > saveInputFileMetaInfo.clone.0 (IIRC).
Yeah, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01186.html Jakub
