On Wed, 20 May 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > int i;
> > float f;
> > void foo()
> > {
> > int *p = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int));
> > *p = 1;
> > i = *p;
> > float *q = (float *)p;
> > *q = 2.0;
> > f = *q;
> > }
>
> Yes, I think that's a valid program too. I'm OK with giving up this
> optimization; clearly we need to be correct first and foremost.
Yes, that's the primary motivation of this patch. Can I take this
as an approval for the C++ frontend changes?
Thanks,
Richard.
