Nicolas COLLIN wrote: > Hello, > first of all excuse me for my english but I'm french so sometimes I make > some mistakes (many ?). > I wonder if the intermediate representation (tree) that you describe on > this page (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Trees.html#Trees) was > already implented in egcs 1.1. > Indeed I have to work on this version and this tree appears very > interesting to me because it could help me a lot.
What you are doing is very unusual! EGCS-1.1 is from September 1998; the document at the URL describes the current state of trees in modern GCC. EGCS did use trees back then, but the support will have changed a very great deal in the past ten years! Many of the core macros - TREE_xxxx, DECL_xxxx, TYPE_xxxx, etc - will be more-or-less the same between the two, but many of the semantics of the tree nodes may be different. cheers, DaveK