Dave Korn wrote: > Tim Prince wrote: >> Dave Korn wrote: >> >>> Heh, I was just about to post that, only I was looking at $clooginc rather >>> than $pplinc! The same problem exists for both; I'm pretty sure we should >>> fall back on $prefix if the --with option is empty. >>> >> When I bootstrapped gcc 4.5 on cygwin yesterday, configure recognized the >> newly installed ppl, but not the cloog. The bootstrap completed >> successfully, and I'm not looking a gift horse in the mouth. > > You don't have a bogus /include dir, but I bet you'll find -I/include in > PPLINC. > > It would be interesting to know why it didn't spot cloog. What's in your > top-level $objdir/config.log? >
#include <cloog/cloog.h> no such file -I/include was set by configure. As you say, there is something bogus here. setup menu shows cloog installed in development category, but I can't find any such include file. Does this mean the cygwin distribution of cloog is broken?
