>> No, it was not. So you can drop in gmp/mpfr, or ppl/cloog, but not all >> four. > > I would like to again suggest that we declare in-tree builds of this > stuff out of scope.
For ppl/cloog which are not mandatory I agree. I think in-tree GMP/MPFR however is especially useful for people who build on non-GNU/Linux systems, where packaging of free software libraries is not as well developed as RPM/DEB/ports. Paolo
