Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > I don't see a request, yet more than two people seem to agree, > so: can we have a slush (no new merges or features) while the > tree is stabilized? > > I'll let other people answer the "why" wrt. priority platforms; > the double breakages for cris-elf (PR39927, PR39938) don't > count. :/
Even if all the primary/secondary platforms were fixed right now, I think that it is good to slow down, since we found out the hard way that SSA expansion has relatively deep target-dependent ramifications. Paolo
