> Note that the issue is with our representation of POINTER_PLUS_EXPR > which insists on using sizetype for the pointer offset argument > (where I don't remember if m32c uses a bigger or smaller mode for > sizetype than for pointers). Whenever the sizes of the modes for > pointers and sizetype do not match we have a problem. > > Note that while this particular issue may likely be fixed with > the no-undefined-overflow branch work the above much general issue > is _not_ fixed by it.
What about forbidding pointer induction variables completely if the modes for sizetype and pointers do not match? Paolo
