On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 22:45 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Laurent GUERBY <laur...@guerby.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Trunk on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi (compile farm gcc50) currently fails > > about 1000 C tests: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-03/msg00810.html > > > > 99% of those fail are neon FAIL: > > > > ... > > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vst4_laneu32.c scan-assembler vst4.32[ \\t]+\\ > > \\{(([dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]-[dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\])|([dD][0-9]+\ > > \\\[[0-9]+\\\\], [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], > > [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]))\\\\}, \\\\[[rR][0-9]+\\\\]!?([ \ > > \...@[a-za-z0-9 ]+)?\\n > > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vst4_laneu8.c (test for excess errors) > > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vst4_laneu8.c scan-assembler vst4.8[ > > \\t]+\\\\{(([dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]-[dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\])|([dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], > > [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], > > [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]))\\\\}, \\\\[[rR][0-9]+\\\\]!?([ > > \\...@[a-za-z0-9 ]+)?\\n > > > > A while ago I opened (but there were far less neon FAIL): > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38697 > > > > There is also: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39361 > > > > arm-eabi is listed as primary platform here: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html > > > > Do you know why all these tests are failing? > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00442.html
r144713, just after the above patch commit, indeed has far less neon failures: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-03/msg01066.html I still have received no answer or hint about why some neon tests are still failing: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38697 Sincerely, Laurent
