Ahhh ok, so basically I've hit the same wall as for the constant folding and constant propagation! Oh well, I will see how important it is for me to try to fix it in this case.
Thanks for the answer, Jc On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> I want the version of foo because the store with an address as >> destination is costly on my architecture, which is why I defined >> TARGET_ADDRESS_COST and added a cost when I get this scenario. >> However, in the compilation of this code, it seems that, when the >> function is inlined, the address_cost function does not seem to be >> called anymore. Any ideas why ? > > This is (a variant of) PR33699. > > Paolo > >
