On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Joseph S. Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> Do we really need a new snapshot when only DATESTAMP is updated? I >> think it is a waste >> of resources.
It is. > When 4.4 has branched I plan to close 4.2 branch. Maybe we can remove DATESTAMP and updating it now that gcc_update understands to extract the SVN revision number? Richard.