On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 10:51 +0000, Dave Korn wrote: > Laurent GUERBY wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 21:04 +0100, Rolf Ebert wrote: > >>> Right, that's why the change should be reverted on the 4.3 branch. On > >>> the > >>> other hand, if you can get the ZCX support to work on the mainline before > >>> 4.4.0 is released, we could try there. > >> FYI, I have just succeeded in building gcc-4.3.3 including Ada for MinGW > >> by setting > >> ZCX_By_Default : constant Boolean := True; > >> in system-mingw.ads as suggested by Danny Smith. The ACATS tests show > >> quite some failures, though. I don't know if they are due to the EH or > >> if there are other causes. > > > > Sometimes from the list of failures it's possible to identify what's > > broken. Did you send your test results to gcc-testresu...@? I couldn't > > find them. > > These figures are from Cygwin so won't be strictly commensurable, but it > would be interesting to compare them to the figures with that accidental > change reverted. > > gcc-4.3.2, GNAT runtime statically linked, --disable-sjlj-exceptions. (I > think this is basically 'anything that raises an exception fails'):
Thanks for the list. I think it's more tasking which is broken than exceptions since many exception tests do PASS, eg: c34001c. "c9" tests are tasking test and they all FAIL. Laurent
