>>> However, I don't agree that P2 regressions aren't a factor. If we have >>> a ton of crashing on wrong-code, etc., regressions that adds up to a >>> release that won't work well for people. >> >> In which case the important ones should be P1 ... > > No, that misses the point. A mass of bugs, each itself not too > critical, can still make a release that is of substandard quality. > Think of the integral of perceived quality over the intended user-base.
Yes, that was the meaning more-or-less of my "50 P2" criteria. Still, I would like to hear an opinion on what to do with regard to long standing bugs that are clearly not going to be fixed in stage3/4. This was the main point of my message. Paolo
