On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 04:34:09AM -0800, Joern Rennecke wrote: > Quoting Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com>: > > I'm not sure what your point is here. newlib is not under the GPL in > > any case. It is not affected by the gcc runtime library license. > > The old runtime library exception allowed you to distribute binaries that > both include pieces of the gcc runtime and arbitrary pieces of newlib, > without requiring the distribution to be under the terms of the GPL. > I.e. your could link non-GPL code against both the gcc runtime and newlib > and distribute it. > The new license does not allow this unless all parts included from newlib > are written in a high level language AND use the gcc runtime.
Please quote the part of the license that you believe says this. I think that you are mistaken.
