On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:03 PM, David Daney <dda...@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > H.J. Lu wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I got a request to try "FOO.H" if foo.h doesn't exist when dealing >> with >> >> #include "foo.h" >> >> Any comments? >> > > How about "Foo.h", "FOo.H", etc.? > > I have found as many errors with mixed case screw-ups as with the 'single > case' variety you mention. >
When case insensitive include is enabled, there are no differences among "foo.h", "FOO.H", "Foo.h", "FOo.H". It will be user's responsibility to name his/her files properly. -- H.J.
