On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 06:52:18PM +1100, zol...@bendor.com.au wrote:
> // Debug( tst->value );
>
> if ( ! tst ) {
> ptr->next = (void *) 0;
> break;
> }This optimization comes up on the list frequently. Do folks think a corresponding warning would be a win? "warning: ignored NULL check because pointer has already been dereferenced"? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery
