Andrew Haley wrote:
Andrew Thomas Pinski wrote:
C++98 is not C99 :) there is no rvalue to lvalue conversion for rvalue
arrays in C++98. Also this code is still undefined C99 but will most
likely become valid C1x.

Ah, it's an rvalue array.  Good point.
Ok now I understand. I assume this behaviour is not triggered often as in C it is
not so common to have an array which is an rvalue.

Michel


Sent from my iPhone

Advertising on gcc list.  Dear me... ;-)

Andrew.

Reply via email to