On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:38 AM, rajagopal, dwarak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with Michael on the naming and having separate files for AVX and > including all the header files inside x86intrin.h. > > Also it would be easy for the users if we include all the instruction > sets supported by both Intel and AMD in x86intrin.h file so that it is > sufficient for the application developers to use only one header file > for all the x86 based systems. >
<x86intrin.h> was rejected by icc. <immintrin.h> is selected. I don't see why you can't include AMD intrinsic header files in <immintrin.h>. The <immintrin.h> patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00145.html You can provide a patch against it to include AMD intrinsic header files. -- H.J.
