On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 16:01, Jeff Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not really involved in the LTO stuff at all, but my recommendation would > be to severely de-emphasize any non-ELF targets -- to the point where I'd > say LTO is only supported on ELF targets.
Yeah, I agree. We are certainly not planning on adding support for anything but ELF targets. There exists some superficial support for other file formats, but the work would be non-trivial. Thanks. Diego.
