Hi, Tobias Grosser wrote: > another patch. It contains: > > - Removal of documentation outside of common.opts for (-fgraphite, > -floop-block, -floop-interchange, -floop-strip-mine) > This means doc/invoke.texi. > (Proposed by Richi)
While I agree that -fgraphite does not make sense as user option, I'm not sure about -floop-block and -floop-interchange. I could imagine that some users would like to play with this option (though I have no real opinion about this). > - Removal of flag "-floop-strip-mine", as it never will improve > performance and so there will be no use for it. > (Proposed by Harsha) I might have misunderstood Harsha, but I think he said that it only does not improve the performance if used by itself, i.e. combined with other options it is/might be profitable. Thus one may leave it in as undocumented option. (I have no opinion about this and I did no tests, I only wanted to stress the "by itself".) In any case, those changes should also be documented at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html, which currently lists all options. Tobias B