On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> "(volatile*) > > So this is using implied int then? > Isn't that really considered to be avoided these days? Or perfectly ok in C? > I know it is "legal", but I assume to be avoided as a matter of taste and C++ > compat. > Or you can really omit the type???? I think not. Might be a nice extension > though.
I was typing fast on my iphone :). yes it should have been the volatile type of size and mask. > (*(char*)&i) = 0; is legal as *rvalue is a lvalue. -- Pinski
