Michael Meissner wrote:
>Memcpy/memset optimizations were added to glibc 2.8, though when your
favorite
>distribution will provide it is a different question:
>http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2008-04/msg00050.html
I finally got a SUSE with glibc 2.8. I can see that 32-bit memcpy has
been modified with an extra misalignment branch, but no significant
improvement. Glibc 2.8 is NOT faster than glibc 2.7 in my tests. It
still doesn't use XMM registers.
Glibc 2.8 is still almost 5 times slower than the best function
libraries for unaligned data on Intel Core 2, and the default builtin
function is slower than any other implementation I have seen (copies 1
byte at a time!).
Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
>2008/7/26 Agner Fog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>I have libc version 2.7. Can't find version 2.8
>It's in Fedora 9, I have no idea why the source isn't directly
>available from the glibc homepage.
2.8 is not an official final release yet.
