On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Kenneth Zadeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Berlin wrote: >> you may of course be right and this is what we will end up doing, but the > implications for whopr are not good. The parser is going to have to work > in lockstep with the type merger
Why? You don't want to merge the types in the debuginfo. You only have to parse the debuginfo types that correspond to types you've changed in some fashion (and if you don't want to do that you only have to parse to update the variable info, which means you don't even have to parse or follow the DW_AT_type references)
