On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, DJ Delorie wrote: > I did some work a while back to try to rearrange the reloads so that > registers could be reused, but IMHO the right solution is for gcc to > realize that it needs to break the insn up and reload the parts > separately, perhaps a "relaxing reloader" that can restart reload if > it finds it has run short of registers.
If reload is generally flaky like this for m32c, perhaps a target macro to say not to reload addresses in the particular case my patch affects would be a sensible approach, if things worked better without reloading them even though as far as reload knows they need reloading. -- Joseph S. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
