On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Richard Guenther wrote: > >>> The C++ standard calls this a type pun, so -- with all due respect -- I'm >> >> The C++ standard does not actually call it a type pun, but I think I >> understand what you mean. > > ISO/IEC 14882:2003 (2nd. ed.), > Bottom of Page 76, footnote 67, "This is sometimes referred to as a _type > pun_." > So there!
I stand corrected! And I should be reading footnotes more often (even if they tend to distract.) Thanks. > > Andrew. >
