Ivan Levashew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ian Lance Taylor пишет: >> >> The other major TODO is to work out the details of using STL >> containers with GC allocated objects. This means teaching gengtype >> how to generate code to traverse STL containers, which would then be >> used during GC. This is not a task for the faint-hearted. >> > That's one of the many reasons against C++. Even damn Cyclone will > beat C++ here.
Your comment makes little sense in context. Nobody could claim that the existing gengtype code is simple. Not many people understand how it works at all. In order to support STL containers holding GC objects, it will need to be modified. The fact that modifying it is nontrivial is not an argument either for or against C++. I don't know what you mean by your reference to the Cyclone variant of C, unless you are trying to say something about gcc's use of garbage collection. Ian
