On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > My understanding is that Joseph is just talking about removing the > entries in config.gcc. He is not talking about removing the support > in the code, except perhaps for cases where there is no longer any > entry in config.gcc which requires that support.
Correct (libgcc/config.host, target patterns in testcases etc. are also covered). Files in config/ are only removed when no configuration uses them. If a file is removed while still being used by another target, that's a mistake and the file should be restored; if a file (formerly used by some targets) remains while no target uses it, that's also a mistake and it should be removed. -- Joseph S. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
