2008/6/9 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is there any reason why "gcc -Wall" doesn't emit warnings by default >> on some useless extensions such as pointer arithmetic on (void *)? > > Use -pedantic to warn about extensions. It doesn't make sense to > warn for extensions if they are not deprecated. After all they are > extensions.
Nonetheless, I think that the part about -Wc++-compat not warning about pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic is a valid criticism. Don't you agree? Cheers, Manuel.
