Richard Guenther wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Kai Tietz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> as I noticed, most hash value calculations are trying to use pointer >> values for building the value and assume that a long/unsigned long scalar >> is wide enough for a pointer. This is at least for w64 target not true. So >> I want to know, if it would be good to introduce an gcc specific type for >> those kind of casts, or to use ssize_t/size_t.? > > it's uintptr_t which should be used, if only as an intermediate cast - > (unsigned long)(uintptr_t)ptr.
That's not possible because, IIRC, gcc must compile on C90 systems. Andrew.
