> Yes, it is bad to have it there for C/C++, please make sure the final > \0 isn't printed.
The question is: how? If we limit the tree dumps to C/C++ semantics, then there's no way they can express Fortran code (ie a string litteral not terminated by a NUL), is there? Or do we make the semantics of tree dumps depend on the language compiled? (which seems a bad idea) FX -- FX Coudert http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~uccafco/
