Eric Botcazou wrote:
Fails here on ia64.
OK, this should be fixed everywhere now.
I haven't had enough time to build every RTEMS target yet
but sparc looks better. Can I commit the RTEMS specific
patch posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg01581.html
that is required to even compile the trunk?
It builds now and gave this on ACATS:
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes 2297
# of unexpected failures 10
# of unsupported tests 8
c37213j c37213k c47007a c47009a c64005c c64005d c953002 ca11012
cc50a01 cdd2a02
Last posted results were
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-04/msg00267.html
=============================================================================
sparc-rtems4.9-gcc (GCC) 4.4.0 20080403 (experimental) [trunk revision
133868]
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes 2299
# of unexpected failures 13
# of unsupported tests 3
*** FAILURES: c37213j c37213k c47007a c47009a c64005c c64005d c953002
cxg2005
cxg2012 cxg2014 cxg2017 cxg2018 cxg2020
=============================================================================
Five of the failures in that run were due to sis deficiencies in
floating point accuracy which does not occur on Gaisler's tsim.
So I marked these as unsupported between the two runs since I
didn't see much that was gcc's fault.
The new failures are:
ca11012 - exception not raised in child package on complex op
cc50a01 - memory access fault
cdd2a02 -
raised CONSTRAINT_ERROR : fdd2a00.adb:40 range check failed
So for sparc-rtems, there are a few regression from earlier in
the month.
--
Eric Botcazou
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
