On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 14:22, Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> extract_ops_from_tree would return GIMPLE_COPY as subcode and > the whole expression as op1, where's the problem? Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were advocating *against* GIMPLE_COPY. > > I need to introduce GIMPLE_TERNARY_RHS (for ASSERT_EXPR) and > > GIMPLE_QUATERNARY_RHS (for COND_EXPR), > > How are you going to represent the COND_EXPRs (i.e., where are you > going to put their comparison operator)? Well, until 10 seconds ago, I was going to represent 'a = (b > c) ? x : y' with GIMPLE_ASSIGN <GT_EXPR, b, c, x, y> *but* that could be confused with 'a = (b > c)', so I have to think more about it. Diego.
