H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 07:50:12AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> H.J. Lu wrote:
> >I agree with it. There is no right or wrong here Let's start from
> >scratch and figure out
> >what is the best way to handle this, assuming we are defining a new psABI.
BTW, just tested icc and icc doesn't generate cld either (so it matches the
new gcc behavior).
char buf1[32], buf2[32];
void bar (void);
void foo (void)
{
__builtin_memset (buf1, 0, 32);
bar ();
__builtin_memset (buf2, 0, 32);
}
Icc follows the psABI. If we are saying icc/gcc 4.3 need a fix, we'd
better define
a new psABI first.
Not a fix, an (optional) workaround for a system bug.
-hpa
