Robert Dewar write:
>Usually there are ways of telling what is going on at a sufficiently
>low level, but in any case, code using the conditional jump instruction
>(jo/jno) is hugely better than what we do now (and it is often faster
>to usea jo than into).

My point is that using INTO or some other processor's overlow mechanism
that requires operating system support wouldn't necessarily be better for
Ada, even it performs better (or uses less space) than the alternatives.
Having the program crash with a vague exception would meet the
requirements of -ftrapv, but not Ada.

                                        Ross Ridge

Reply via email to