On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 20:56 +0100, J.C. Pizarro wrote: > I've ideas when there are repetitive processes as e.g. the testing processes. > > Q1. Why to lose time testing the same reiterated files that always had worked > for many months or years?
To use an old expression, "past performance is no guarantee of future performance". Just because a test has passed hundreds of times before does not mean that a small change will not introduce a regression. In my experience, sometimes regressions occur where I least expect them. Ben
