On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:11:41PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Gerald Pfeifer wrote on Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:06:14PM CET: > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > > So does you above OK also extend to the 4.3 branch? > > > > Heh, by committing to the 4.2 branch you made this a regression in 4.3 > > now. :-} It's not in any GCC 4.2 release yet, so not a high priority > > for GCC 4.3.0, I guess, but would be nice to see this in GCC 4.3.1 at > > least (after a bit more exposure in HEAD perhaps). > > Jakub gave me ok for 4.2 branch, and I committed there.
I guess we're OK as long as 4.3.1 comes out before the next 4.2.x release. But I think in general we should avoid this kind of thing (creating a new regression by fixing a bug in 4.2.x and not in 4.3.x).
