Hi, Any chance of someone with ARM knowledge dealing with this issue before the branch is cut.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35071 Uros Bizjak thinks it is just a typo in an assembly file but no one who has commented on this PR is comfortable saying that.
Just a wild guess, could this be a typo? [EMAIL PROTECTED] arm]$ grep do_itt * ieee754-df.S: do_itt eq ieee754-sf.S: do_itt eq However, we have: lib1funcs.asm:.macro do_it cond, suffix="" and many references to "do_it" macro in asm sources.
Thanks. --joel Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Status ====== We are in Stage 3 and the trunk is open for regression and documentation fixes only. We have reached our goal of zero open P1 regressions (in fact several times, but each time different P1s appeared), so 4.3.0 release candidate will be created early next week. There is still time to get important bugfixes into the release candidate. On Monday branches/gcc-4_3-branch will be created, and the trunk subsequently open for Stage 1 of 4.4. 4.3 branch will be afterwards frozen until the release candidate is created, any changes to the branch will require RM approval. Quality Data ============ Progress has been made over the last 2.5 weeks, on P1 regressions as well as P2 regressions. Priority # Change from Last Report -------- -- ----------------------- P1 0 - 2 P2 74 - 14 P3 4 + 2 ----- -- ----------------------- Total 78 - 14 There are still 38 P4 and 91 P5 regressions, this is the last chance to get them fixed before the release candidate. Previous Report =============== http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-01/msg00507.html
-- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985
