On 06/02/2008, Felipe Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 1:18 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 06/02/2008, Felipe Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > So, shouldn't gcc allow this without warnings then?
> > >
> > > typedef enum OMX_ERRORTYPE
> > > {
> > > OMX_ErrorNone = 0,
> > > OMX_ErrorInsufficientResources = 0x80001000
> > > } OMX_ERRORTYPE;
> > >
> >
It seems that this is a correct warning.
"Even though the underlying type of an enum is unspecified, the type
of enumeration constants is explicitly defined as int (6.4.4.3/2 in
the C99 Standard)."
from: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-07/msg00993.html
Nonetheless, the comment from Zack is right, so shouldn't we make the
conversion independently of the warning ?
Cheers,
Manuel.
