On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Jack Howarth wrote: > Richard, > Just to clarify, does this mean that any architecture > which doesn't have a fully optimized cost-model currently > in gcc trunk will have to wait for gcc 4.4? I ask because > the cost-model bugs wouldn't actually be a regressions > from gcc 4.2. I mainly wanted to make sure that we didn't > have some cost-model changes sitting around unsubmitted > that would have to be postponed until gcc 4.4.
I have no idea how these "bugs" will look like, so I cannot give you a definitive answer on this question. But as always, nothing is impossible, especially if it only involves target specific changes. Richard.
