Sergei Poselenov writes: > Hello Andrew, > > > Now, I sympathize that in your particular case you have a code size > > regression. This happens: when we do optimization in gcc, some code > > bases will lose out. All that we can promise is that we try not to > > make it worse for most users. > > > > What we can do is compare your code that has got much worse, and try > > to figure out why. > > > > Would the generated asm listings be enough? Or should I send > the preprocessed sources as well?
Both. Rather than sending stuff, best to stick it on a web site if you can. Having said that, your example is tiny, so it's likely that it won't be very representative, and the less representative the code is the less likely a gcc maintainer will be interested. But at least we'll be able to see the difference. Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903
