Andrew Pinski wrote:
On 1/8/08, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh that clears up my confusion. So the right fix would be downgrading this
redefinition problem to be pedwarn instead. But I see no point in creating a
bug report if its just gonna be closed as invalid, so I hope we can discuss
if its feasible to downgrade this error to be a pedwarn.
It is already a pedwarn. Just the C++ front-end enables pedwarn as
being errors by default and downgrades them as being warnings with
-fpermissive. This is the whole point of -fpermissive.
Not at all!!! -fpermissive can (in weird cases, agreed) change code
generation. I'm pretty sure you don't want to risk that only to silence
an error.
I wonder if this requires a new diagnostic category, something like:
if (pedantic)
pedwarn ("...")
else
warning ("...")
Paolo
