On Dec 3, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) wrote:
> In my view, ChangeLog is mostly "write-only" from a developer's
> perspective. It's a document that the GNU project requires us to produce
> for
... a good example of compliance with the GPL:
5. Conveying Modified Source Versions.
a) The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified
it, and giving a relevant date.
FWIW, I've used ChangeLogs to find problems a number of times in my 14
years of work in GCC, and I find them very useful. When I need more
details, web-searching for the author of the patch and some relevant
keywords in the ChangeLog will often point at the relevant e-mail, so
burdening people with adding a direct URL seems pointless to me. It's
pessimizing the common case for a small optimization in far less
common cases.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org}
