ACATS is clean (0 FAIL) on trunk for x86. CXF3A03 is the only FAIL for hppa-linux. c41328a is the only FAIL for powerpc64-linux. cxb3014/16 are the only FAIL on ia64-linux.
You'll quickly find up to date ACATS results here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-12/ Laurent On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 12:48 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi, > > Even with the large gnat1 compile time issue, I > have managed to patiently run the ACATS on > powerpc-rtems. This configuration worked > well with gcc 4.2.2 (3 failures). I am seeing > lot of failures (total of 691) and they do not > appear to be RTEMS related. > > Here is a sample. Do any of these look like > know problems? Does anyone see them on other > platforms? > > > ,.,. C34003C ACATS 2.5 88-01-01 00:00:00 > ---- C34003C CHECK THAT ALL VALUES OF THE PARENT (BASE) TYPE ARE PRESENT > FOR THE DERIVED (BASE) TYPE WHEN THE DERIVED TYPE > DEFINITION IS CONSTRAINED. ALSO CHECK THAT ANY > CONSTRAINT IMPOSED ON THE PARENT SUBTYPE IS ALSO IMPOSED > ON THE DERIVED SUBTYPE. CHECK FOR DERIVED FLOATING > POINT TYPES. > > raised CONSTRAINT_ERROR : c34003c.adb:104 range check failed > > > ,.,. CXG2013 ACATS 2.5 88-01-01 00:00:00 > ---- CXG2013 Check the accuracy of the TAN and COT functions. > > raised ADA.NUMERICS.ARGUMENT_ERROR : a-ngelfu.adb:969 instantiated at > cxg2013.adb:100 instantiated at cxg2013.adb:337 > > ,.,. CXF3A03 ACATS 2.5 88-01-01 00:00:00 > ---- CXF3A03 Check that function Length returns the number of characters > in the edited output string produced by function Image, > for a particular decimal type, currency string, and > radix mark. Check that function Valid returns correct > results based on the particular decimal value, and the > Picture and Currency string parameters. > > raised ADA.IO_EXCEPTIONS.LAYOUT_ERROR : a-teioed.adb:300 > > > ,.,. CXF2001 ACATS 2.5 88-01-01 00:00:00 > ---- CXF2001 Check that the Divide procedure provides correct results. > Check that the Remainder is calculated exactly. > > raised CONSTRAINT_ERROR : a-decima.adb:59 divide by zero > > Thanks. > > --joel >
