On Dec 12, 2007, at 3:41 PM, Harvey Harrison wrote:
In terms of implementation, we will likely use the LTO branch as a
basis. Many of the features we will need are already being
implemented
in the branch, so we will keep helping with that implementation.
I'm curious how this interacts/complements with any efforts to
using the LLVM IR in LTO.
Any pointers to where that discussion ended up?
There are no plans to integrate LLVM with mainline GCC. LLVM
maintains its own permanent fork of GCC, which we periodically sync
up with GCC's progress (e.g. LLVM 2.2 will include a GCC 4.2 based
front-end). There is also work underway to build llvm-native front-
end technology (http://clang.llvm.org).
If you want LTO today, feel free to go to http://llvm.org/ :)
otherwise LLVM is irrelevant to this discussion.
-Chris
http://llvm.org/
http://clang.llvm.org/
http://nondot.org/sabre/
