Boris Boesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, I think I found it: GCC leaves control-flow operations as they > are, if it can not place other operations in branch delay slots > (represented as SEQUENCEs in GCC); or in other words: GCC does not > represent empty delay slots. > > Is this correct?
Yeah. See e.g. the way the MIPS port deals with this. The jump and call patterns add a nop to the asm string when final_sequence is null. Richard
