Jason Merrill wrote: > One solution to this issue would be to simply disallow attributes on > structs after the definition. Failing that, we need to define how they > interact with the type system. Opinions?
We had a discussion about this a while back: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-10/msg00318.html Roughly speaking, it seemed like my proposal was approximately acceptable to those who commented -- except that it seemed that it actually allowed a bit more than we need to do so. In particular, my reading of that thread is that people seemd to agree we could simply disallow attributes after the definition, which is fine by me. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
