>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joe> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:20:21AM +0100, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: >> Is there any progress in the gcc-plugin project ? Joe> Non-technical holdups. RMS is worried that this will make it too easy Joe> to integrate proprietary code directly with GCC. Joe> If proponents can come up with good arguments about how the plugin Joe> project can be structured to avoid this risk, that would help. First, aren't we already in this situation? There are at least 2 compilers out there that re-use parts of GCC by serializing trees and then reading them into a different back end. Second, how does the LTO project avoid this same worry? Tom
